There is an article
on Daily Mail about eggs from aborted human females being used In Vitro
Fertilization (IVF). The idea is that the ovaries of the aborted female
would be harvested and the eggs cultivated in a lab and then used in IVF
treatments where a donor egg is required. Ultimately, this would lead to
the birth of a baby whose biological mother was never born.
I haven't read any of
the study results first hand, so I cannot speak to the scientific accuracy of
the article. Therefore, let’s discuss
the issue purely as a hypothetical.
There are several
ethical issues involved with harvesting eggs from an aborted fetus:
1) How do you tell a
child (or an adult person for that matter) that their biological mother was
never born? This would be incredibly difficult for a person to process.
Imagine the feeling of knowing that you were given a life to live
because your mother died, that you were given a life she never got to
experience.
2) Who owns the
genetic information contained in those eggs?
At this point in our society we do not grant the rights of person-hood to
the unborn. So, do we give the right of donation to the woman who had the
abortion? Is the body of the unborn child her property once it leaves her
body? Is it ok to use these eggs with permission from no one? What
kind of genetic testing will be done?
How will this information be used?
There really is no end to the questions and I don’t see how an adequate
solution can be developed. Keep in mind
that to give donation rights to the mother alone would be an issue because it
isn’t her genes alone she is donating; it is also the genes from the father.
3) Both 1 and 2 are
major ethical hang-ups in my opinion, but what I would really like to talk
about in this post is the dichotomy in our society regarding the issue of
life. Consider this scenario:
Jane is 19, in her
first year of college, and discovers she is pregnant. She decides this is not the time for her to
have a child and she has an abortion.
Jane was carrying a little girl and at the abortion clinic they ask if
she will donate the ovaries from that little girl. Jane decides to do this; the nurse tells her
all about how the eggs she donates will help a couple in need conceive a
child. Jane wants children someday, just
not now, and she hates to see anyone who wants a child denied one. Plus, it means that this whole ordeal wasn’t
for nothing; it had a purpose, right?
She feels sort of empty and alone now that everything is done, maybe
donating the ovaries will help bring her closure and make that empty feeling go
away.
During this time, Tom
and Mary are deciding what to do next.
They have tried everything imaginable to conceive and are left with two
options: adoption or IVF with a donor embryo.
They consider the pros and cons.
Adoption can take years and there is always the chance that the mother will
change her mind. Can we deal with that
they wonder? They have been at this for
3 years already. IVF on the other hand…it’s
expensive sure, but they can start soon and maybe have a child by next year.
Tom and Mary go to the
in vitro clinic and choose to use eggs from Jane’s aborted fetus. The treatment takes and 9 months later they
have a healthy baby girl. Effectively
making Jane, who thought she was too young to be a mother, a 20 year old
grandmother.
The fact that we would
consider using eggs from an aborted female highlights a real problem in our
society: we are confused about life. We
seem to define life as that which is “wanted.”
This is illogical. How can we
justify valuing the eggs (and the life they can potentially produce) more than
we value the human girl they came from? Her
little body was simply tossed aside after being stripped for parts. On one end of the spectrum we are literally
tossing life in the trash and on the other we are painstakingly and expensively
creating it in a lab.
In our story, Jane
wanted to donate the eggs to help a couple in need. What if she were told about the amazing gift
she could give a couple, as well as her unborn child, by choosing adoption? Would Tom and Mary have been less excited to
have this little girl? Remember, they
only decided against adoption because it is an arduous, bureaucratic nightmare,
but isn’t there a way to fix that? And
wouldn’t it be well worth our time to help parents waiting for children more
quickly find the children who need parents?
A world in which
unfertilized eggs are worth more than a growing female fetus is a world
confused and conflicted. We create the
very thing we have just destroyed.
I tire of the
legal/illegal argument regarding abortion.
Most people, regardless of how they feel about the legality of the
procedure, agree that abortion is not ideal and should, at the very least, be
rare. Let’s get creative and have a
discussion about how to make abortions rare or even unnecessary. By changing the conversation and making
adoption a decision to be praised and honored in our society we could decrease
the overall number of abortions and fix a bit of the confusion in our society
about life.
